School Athletics in 2018 – How To Do
It Well
Scott G. McNevan, MBA
Assistant Head of School – Co-Curriculars
& Residential Life
Athletic
Director
It has been
said routinely by coaches and administrators for years that ‘athletics are an
extension of the classroom’. This very
American mantra (most countries do not embrace athletics so formally in their
school systems) is more true today than ever.
As technology annually provides our students with more and more
opportunity for inactive stimulation, it can be argued that the value of
participating in organized school sports is at an all-time high. While the value is inherently there, just as
it is for learning about literature or social sciences, the delivery is
something that many schools take for granted and should re-evaluate. How can schools deliver quality athletic
programming well in 2018?
DEFINE
SUCCESS
The
traditional measures of athletic success are performance-based statistics. How many games did the team win? How many points did the player score? How many saves did the goalkeeper make? Similar to test scores in the classroom,
these quantitative measurements provide us with information about output. In this way stats are used to identify high
performing teams and individuals. However,
it is very important for school leadership to avoid over-prioritizing
traditional stats as the only measure of success. In over-focusing on wins and losses we lose
one of sport’s most teachable moments, context-based reflection. In addition to competitive results, defining
success for a school’s athletic teams and programs must include other contextual
considerations like the starting point of pre-season expectations, injuries and
other adversity throughout a season, the amount of improvement over time,
academic performance of athletes, graduation rates, and representation of community
core values. It is a valuable exercise
for school leadership to pause and reflect on what contextual considerations
are most important to them outside of competitive results. The real benefactors of this reflection are
the student-athletes, who can begin to learn that winning and losing are
relative and that defining success is context-based.
ALIGN WITH
THE MISSION
Every school
has a mission statement. Most athletic
departments have a mission statement.
The exercise of creating a mission is important and valuable work. It helps an organization realize its
identity. However, more important than creating
a mission is living it out in day to day operations. The mission is the lighthouse. It is there to guide operating decisions
through the good and the bad. When
things seem troubled and confusing, the mission is there as a beacon, helping a
school to stay on course. For athletics
to be done well, the department, like all others at the school, must align with
the mission. School leadership must be
very intentional about its athletic policies, ensuring that decisions are made
with intent to reflect the mission, rather than in an arbitrary fashion. As an
example, at Andrews Osborne Academy our mission is to develop students who can lead
and serve in a global community. To
ensure our student-athletes don’t confuse team goals with the mission, we support
participation in school activities outside of athletics, even during the
season. This year the senior captain of the boys’ varsity basketball team also
pursued a lead role in a school theatre production. Restricting him from doing this due to ‘team commitments’
would not have aligned with our mission.
By being a part of both experiences, he is becoming more prepared to
lead and serve in his community going forward.
KEEP
PERSPECTIVE ON THE LANDSCAPE
The
landscape of youth sports has been changing steadily for the past twenty
years. Much has been documented about
the rise of club sports, the loss of unstructured play due to technology, and
the more frequent participation in year-round training for kids. Despite one’s opinions on these topics, it is
vital for a school to recognize and accept the reality of this landscape. We are incapable of changing the greater
environment of youth sports. However, we
are very capable of considering the realities of that environment and then
being creative. Many schools have made
the mistake of taking a defensive posture regarding their athletics, asking
families to ‘choose a side’. Some have
even instituted penalties for those that participate in outside training rather
than with the school-endorsed program. Schools
should not so easily choose this adversarial position. Sports-loving families are always going to
find ways for their student-athlete to participate in programming that they
believe is best. Whether or not we agree
with their thinking on this, it is a reality we should accept. Keeping a big perspective on this and
choosing to be creative in the ways we approach things can prevent a lot of
frustration and encourage stronger relationships with families. Examples of this usually involve compromise. If a family would like their middle-school
aged daughter to participate on both a club soccer team and the school team,
seek a way to make this work. Instead of
blindly sticking to old policies that link attendance to playing time without
any conversation, determine to be creative.
Perhaps the club team schedule can take priority and the player can be
warmly welcomed to school practices and games when she is available. Perhaps when she is available a starting
role, while warranted based on caliber, is not granted while instead
considerable playing time off the bench is agreed upon. There are many creative ways to provide an
outcome that benefits both the school and, most importantly, the
student-athlete.
DON’T FORGET
TO HAVE FUN
Students are
experiencing higher levels of stress and anxiety today than ever before. Pressure stemming from parents, outside club
sports, social media dynamics, and normal adolescent turbulence is combined
with growing academic pressure at many schools to create a very unhealthy
equation for the student. School
athletics can avoid contributing to this.
While hard work, determination, and perseverance remain foundational
expectations of any good coach, it is vital for all of us to remember that
sports are supposed to be fun. Inside
the structures of training and practice, it is not only possible but necessary
to incorporate moments of silly, goofy fun for student-athletes. There are many moments during every season
that call for some light-hearted play.
Sometimes it can be spontaneous, providing a disheartened team with 15
minutes to try a new, unstructured game just to break the tension. Other times it can be planned, scheduling a
light, fun practice to compensate for a series of tougher, more physical
days. One goal of every coach should be
to see each student-athlete finishing their season loving that sport just as
much or more than they did on day one of the season. If we are not seeing smiles or hearing
laughter from our student-athletes, we may be forgetting to incorporate enough
fun into the schedule.
BREAK THE
CYCLE
One of the
biggest challenges for school athletics is finding, developing, and retaining
good coaches. The demands of coaching in
2018 are significant. There is a long list
of certifications to complete, increased expectations from schools and parents,
and evolving needs from student-athletes to deal with. Schools should be sensitive to these demands
on coaches, provide the resources necessary, and support them well. However, one thing schools cannot afford to
do anymore is turn a blind eye towards coaches who continue an outdated, unhealthy,
unacceptable cycle of treating student-athletes poorly. I’m not referring to the need for coaches to
maintain high expectations or push their players out of comfort zones at
times. I’m talking about the boundaries
regarding language, terminology, and appropriate methods of motivation. There once was a day when coaches motivated
more commonly through yelling, screaming, and emotional outbursts towards
student-athletes. Questionable language
and intimidation were more widely accepted.
Thankfully, that day has passed.
Students still need a strong response from coaches at times. What they don’t need is to be publicly
embarrassed or shamed in front of their peers.
They don’t need to be screamed at routinely or motivated frequently
through threats or aggressive behavior.
Most of the time when coaches act this way today, they are simply
repeating a standard experienced from their playing days in high school. They are continuing a cycle that must be
broken. The best coaches in 2018 are
those who build a deeper toolbox of resources.
They are committed to being good communicators, highlighting goals and
objectives, planning well, and staying relatively positive as a role model for
their players. Schools that look the
other way and continue to support coaches who perpetuate this cycle do so at
the expense of their own student-athlete experience.
At AOA we
are committed to doing school athletics well.
We’re adding new programming, re-evaluating the ways in which we measure
success, and establishing new goals for our athletic department. It is an exciting time to be here. Go Phoenix!
No comments:
Post a Comment